News

Arctic invasions

In a region that is opening up to more shipping activity, bringing about the potential for the occurrence of non-indigenous species, studies are needed to know what is already there.
Published: 30 October 2015

​​​​​​​​The spread of non-indigenous species (NIS) is now recognized as one of the greatest threats to the ecological and economic well-being of the planet, causing enormous damage to native biodiversity and negatively impacting commercially important natural resources.​​​

The Arctic region has been "rapidly cha​nging"​ and the expected increase in shipping activity opens the possibilities for the introduction of non-indigenous species. In 2015, the ICES/IOC/IMO Working Group on Ballast and other Ship Vectors (WGBOSV) ​has been discussing new developments in non-native species issues associated with all shipping activity​in the Arctic. This is in line with ICES Strategic Plan​ and the efforts of the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020 outlined in the 2013 Arctic Biodiversity Assessment (CAFF, 2013​), part of which states "by 2020, invasive alien species and pathways are identified and prioritized, priority species are controlled or eradicated, and measures are in place to manage pathways to prevent their introduction and establishment".  ​

So far, fewer invasive species have been recorded at high latitudes but this may stem from the fact that there have been fewer Arctic studies. There is however an increased effort in identifying the new introductions and pathways.

Finding out what is already there

One such study was led by Jesica Goldsmit, PhD candidate​, a benthic invertebrate survey to create a baseline for the early detection of non-indigenous species on the Canadian Arctic coastline. The survey was carried out in the three Canadian Arctic ports, Churchill (Manitoba), Deception Bay (Quebec) and Iqaluit (Nunavut), thought to be at the highest risk of exposure to NIS due to their level of shipping activity. A total of 236 genera and species were identified. Of these, 14.4% of the taxa identified are new records within the port regions and 7.2% within the more extended, adjacent surrounding regions.

"These figures are within the expected values considering the size of the region of study" explains Goldsmit, "as the Canadian Arctic is a vast area. Our study is the first step in creating a comprehensive baseline to know what is there so we are able to document any changes. This is such an important step that even new species can be discovered, as has been the case for a new polychaete that has been described and identified for the first time."​

As well as new species, seven species found have been categorized as cryptogenic. These may be native or invasive but there is not enough information about their origin. This is due to a lack of historical information, but also as Goldsmit explains, an unclear distribution pattern. Only one of these species, the polychaete Aricidea ha​rtmani, has been found in other regions of the Canadian Arctic. Some of the other species have been found in West Greenland coasts and in some regions of the European and Asian Arctic. "We term these species cryptogenic since we are not certain about their origin, but in the case they could be considered non-native, the most probable explanation for their introduction would be through shipping."  

Monitoring challenges

Conditions in the Canadian Arctic mean that it is not easily accessible all year due to winter conditions, and even during summer time, the logistics to access and sample the intertidal and subtidal regions with professional divers is complicated. 

"In an ideal world", Goldsmit says, "we would do monitoring surveys every year. The baseline study we carried out is not feasible as an annual monitoring program. If we count the actual area sampled in our survey (80 core samples per port) we ended up sampling only 6 m2. Compare that area to the complete coastline of the Canadian Arctic, which is almost 2 million km2 and we realize how much there is left to know." To increase the established baseline, new techniques and new ways to survey (e.g.; photo analysis and environmental DNA) could contribute, if they are combined with core and quadrat samples such as the kind of study that Goldsmit's team performed. "A collaborative project (DFO, UQAR and Université Laval) recently received funding (through CHARS) to work on developing eDNA techniques and community based training in user-friendly port sampling methods with the goal of having more regular and cost effective monitoring. We will be initiating this program this summer and it is planned to be carried out over the next 3 years in several ports in the Canadian Arctic."​

Containment challenges

When talking about the challenges of containing invasive species, Goldsmit lists communication as a key player. "One of the most important things is to transmit the information and the results that we obtain in our studies so that the public become aware of how species can be transported unintentionally and the possible consequences that this could have. Managers and policymakers also need to understand the scale of the problem of invasive species and make policies that prevent new introductions."​​​

Print this pagePrint it Request newsletterSend to Post to Facebook Post to Twitter Post to LinkedIn Share it
c FollowFollow Focus on ContentFocus on Content
HelpGive Feedback
SharePoint

Arctic invasions

International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) · Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer (CIEM)
ICES Secretariat · H. C. Andersens Boulevard 44-46, DK 1553 Copenhagen V, Denmark · Tel: +45 3338 6700 · Fax: +45 3393 4215 · info@ices.dk
Disclaimer · © ICES - All Rights Reserved
top