Exciting new approach to fish stock assessment!
One of the key functions of ICES is to provide advice on the status
of fisheries resources in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean and the Baltic
Sea. Landings of fish within the area covered by ICES are close
to 10% of global marine landings,
and some of the world's leading fisheries research institutions
contribute to the ICES advisory process.
|
| The fisheries system
includes the fish stock, fishermen, scientists and the managers. |
However, despite a large and technically complex input to fisheries
management, most stocks in the ICES area are overexploited
and in some cases depleted. Dwindling
fish stocks combined with overcapacity in the fishing fleets have
led to a poor financial return for the fishing industry and a low
or even negative economic contribution from fisheries to national
economies.
To try to improve on this situation, and take a more wide-ranging
approach to fisheries assessment, a new group, the Working
Group on Fishery Systems was established by ICES, in June
2000. The main aim of this group is to "develop a framework
and methodology for the analysis of fishery systems performance".
What is a fisheries system?
A fisheries system includes the fish
stock, the fishermen who
are trying to make a living, the scientists
assessing the fish stock, and finally the managers
who regulate the fishery.
The traditional approach to fisheries assessment mainly concentrates
on the fish stock. Taking a broader approach, the Working Group
will be developing new methods of assessing the whole fisheries
system, whilst at the same time addressing biological, economic,
and social concerns.
Who will be involved?
The study and evaluation of fisheries systems is a challenge that
requires cooperation between the fishermen and several disciplines:
· Biologists and statisticians to evaluate the technical
aspects of the advisory process;
· Economists and sociologists to evaluate the adaptations
of the fishing fleet;
· Political scientists and institutional economists to evaluate
the management decision processes; and
· Sociology of science, to evaluate the linkages between
the biological advice production and other parts of the system.
Many of the disciplines mentioned have not normally participated
in ICES work before and it takes considerable time and interest
from all parties to develop the basic mutual understanding that
is necessary for productive cooperation.
 |
| The Working Group is
looking at methods of assessing the whole fisheries system and
that includes the fishermen! |
Difficulties
It has not been easy recruiting social scientists to the Working
Group as demonstrated by the participation in the first meeting,
in June 2000, where only two out of 14 participants had a social
science background. The reason for this is not lack of interest
- there has actually been considerable interest from various social
science quarters for this work - but lack of funding.
The research institutions that contribute to the ICES advisory
process do not recruit social scientists as part of their mandate,
and social science research institutions do not have funding to
participate. This Working Group could therefore be the first ICES
working group that will have to identify external funding to be
able to continue its work.
Further information
To find out more about this Working Group please contact either
of the co-chairs: Poul Degnbol (Denmark)
or Jon Sutinen (USA).
|