Cod stocks
in trouble The recent ICES advice (October 2002) relating to cod and associated
species is the result of the cumulative failure to control fishing pressure on
a range of stocks over the last decade. As long ago as 1992
ICES advice was, 'Recovery of the cod stock would
require, at minimum, a marked and sustained reduction of effort or even a closure
of the fishery'.
The advice was repeated
in 1993. In 1996 ICES noted that 'recent
analyses
suggest that the stock may collapse under fishing mortality rates
above 0.75. Present fishing mortality is above this level.'
ICES
also stated that, 'As it is unlikely that a lower
fishing mortality can be achieved by the application of technical measures and
or TACs/quotas alone, ACFM believes that the required decrease can only be achieved
by a reduction in effort
in the directed fisheries for cod
and the mixed roundfish fisheries
which take a large cod component'.
It is quite clear that ICES believed
that substantial action was required many years
ago and warned that traditional management tools were not working.
|
| "ICES
advice relating to cod and associated species is the result of the cumulative
failure to control fishing pressure on a range of stocks over the last decade" |
More recent advice in 2000 and 2001
was 'that fishing mortality on cod should be reduced
to the lowest possible level' and re-iterated the failure of TACs to bring
about the necessary reduction. This advice was only one
step short of a closure.
In 2002 the
seriousness of the cod problem prompted the North
Sea Commission Fishery Partnership to conduct a thorough
review of the ICES cod assessment.
It
was carried out by three independent North American
scientists chosen, not by ICES, but by the Partnership. Both the Scottish
Fishermen's Federation and the National
Federation of Fishermens Organisations participated actively in the review.
The industry knew in August exactly what was in the assessment and agreed that
it provided a fair interpretation of the state of the stock (Fishing
News 6 September 2002).
Much has been made in the press about the industry
survey contradicting the scientific assessment. Yet the industry survey was also
reviewed in August by the Partnership and found to be entirely consistent with
the ICES assessment. The survey notes the absence of cod in the southern North
Sea and its 'spotty' distribution.
Sadly this does
not indicate fish have moved north but that large areas are now critically
depleted. This is a classic symptom of a stock close
to collapse and happened with the Canadian cod and the North Sea herring
before their demise.
But why, if both the industry survey and the ICES assessment
indicate more cod in 2002 compared to 2001 does ICES recommend a closure?
The
reasons are twofold.
|
| Graph shows the long-term decline
in one year old cod. | Firstly,
the current death rate of cod, due to all factors, exceeds the rate at which recruits
are being produced. It does not matter whether the deaths are due to fishing,
seals, temperature change or disease, the stock has been ground down so much that
it simply cannot produce enough juveniles to compensate and is in long term decline.
You can see this in the figure which shows the numbers of one year old cod produced
each year since 1963.
The numbers vary a lot but are declining, with the
most recent years the poorest on record. The variation explains why some years
are better than others, but whichever way you look at it the trend is downward.
Secondly, the current assessment has
revised the estimate of spawning biomass in 2001 from
50,000t down to only 30,000t. This change in the assessment has been seen
before and shows that ICES has tended to under-estimate the rate of decline of
the stock.
The estimated increase in 2002 to 38,000t
is still well below the previously calculated
lowest value and there are fears that it too, may be
over-optimistic.
The apparent improvement in 2002 is temporary
and is likely to reverse in the next few years.
That could happen rapidly and irreversibly as happened in Canada.
Fishing
is virtually the only factor we can control, so if we want a sustainable fishery
for cod in the future, it is fishing pressure that we have to reduce. And because
the reduction has been left so late, it has to be very big and very soon. Recent
decommissioning is a step in the right direction, but unfortunately it is simply
not enough to halt the decline.
For Scotland, and some English boats there
is an added problem. Since 1999 there have been
no good year classes of haddock in the North Sea.
That means the
stock will decline rapidly after 2003 and unless a good year class appears soon,
haddock could also collapse. The signs are that 2004 could be a crunch year for
roundfish boats. We need to plan to face that problem now, it is not just cod
that are in jeopardy.
Scientists have wrestled with the problem of this
very difficult advice knowing that it will have huge implications. It was not
given lightly and it remains only scientific advice. The management challenges
in dealing with it are enormous but they need to be faced if we are to have sustainable
fisheries in the future.
Author
Dr
Robin Cook, Director of Fisheries Research
Services, Aberdeen
This article was originally published in Fishing
News 6
December 2002.
|