|
Open Lecture
The Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries, by Keith Sainsbury
(Australia/UK) (Presentation)
Invited Plenary Lectures
Climate Change and Human Impacts on the Marine Environment
and Ecosystems of the Arctic Seas, by Graham Shimmield
(Scotland, UK) (Presentation) (Paper)
Anticipating Fisher Response to Management: Can Economics
Help? by Sean Pascoe (UK) (Presentation) (Paper)
Theme Sessions 2005
For the moment, it is planned to group the Theme
Sessions into the following 4 over-arching categories. In
May, the Consultative Committee will review the submitted
abstracts and may change these arrangements:
- Understanding the Physical, Chemical, and Biological
Functioning of Marine Ecosystems
- Understanding and Quantifying Human Impacts on Marine
Ecosystems, including Living Marine Resources
- Evaluating Options for Sustainable Marine-related Industries,
Particularly Fishing and Mariculture
- Advising on the Sustainable Use of Living Marine Resources
and Protection of the Marine Environment
| THEME SESSIONS 2005 |
Multidisciplinary Approaches to the Identification
of Stock Structure of Small Pelagics: Implications for
Assessment and Sustainable Management
Conveners: Emma Hatfield (UK) and Doug Hay (Canada)
(Session K) (Abstract) (Timetable) (Report)
|
| The Spatial Dimension of Ecosystem
Structure and Dynamics
Conveners: Maria Borges (Portugal), Jason Link (USA),
and Einar Svendsen (Norway) (Session
L) (Abstract) (Timetable) (Report)
|
Impact of External Forcing on Flows in Marine
Trophic Networks
Conveners: Bärbel Müller-Karulis (Latvia),
Villy Christensen (Canada), and Arturas Razinkovas (Lithuania)
(Session M) (Abstract) (Timetable) (Report)
|
Elasmobranch Fisheries Science
Conveners: Maurice Clarke (Ireland), Henk Heessen
(Netherlands), and Jim Ellis (UK) (Session
N) (Abstract) (Timetable) (Report)
|
Connecting Physical-Biological Interactions
to Recruitment Variability, Ecosystem Dynamics, and the
Management of Exploited Stocks
Conveners: Elizabeth North (USA), Mike St. John
(Germany), and Alejandro Gallego (UK) (Session
O) (Abstract) (Timetable) (Report)
|
Regional Ecosystem Pilot Projects, Ecosystem
Forecasting, and Operational Oceanography: Comparing and
Contrasting Scientific Tools, Strategies, Outputs, and
Applications
Conveners: Wulf Greve (Germany), Glen W. Harrison
(Canada), and Skip McKinnell (Canada) (Session
P) (Abstract) (Timetable) (Report)
|
Advances in Reproductive Biology: Methodology
and Applications for Fisheries Science
Conveners: Olav Sigurd Kjesbu (Norway), Gudrun
Marsteinsdottir (Iceland), Joanna Tomkiewicz (Denmark),
and Peter R. Whitthames (UK) (Session
Q) (Abstract) (Timetable) (Report)
|
Marine Mammals: Monitoring Techniques,
Abundance Estimation, and Interactions with Fisheries
Conveners: Mike Hammill (Canada), Tero Härkönen
(Sweden), and Philip Hammond (UK) (Session
R) (Abstract) (Timetable) (Report)
|
Oil Spills in Marine Ecosystems:
Impacts and Remediation
Conveners: Joan Albaigés (Spain) and Kenneth Lee
(Canada) (Session S) (Abstract) (Timetable) (Report)
|
Integrating/Implicating Genetics
into Fisheries Management
Conveners: Ellen Kenchington (Canada) and Filip Volckaert
(Belgium) (Session T) (Abstract) (Timetable) (Report) |
Acoustic Techniques for Three-dimensional
Characterization and Classification of the Pelagic Ecosystem
Conveners: Arnaud Bertrand (France) and Rolf Korneliussen
(Norway) (Session U) (Abstract) (Timetable) (Report)
|
Fishers’ Perceptions and Responses
in Management Implementation.
Conveners: Sakari Kuikka (Finland), Poul Degnbol (Denmark),
and Svein Jentoft (Norway) (Session
V) (Abstract) (Timetable) (Report)
|
Rebuilding Programmes for Threatened
Fish Populations
Conveners: Ted Potter (UK) and Russell Poole (Ireland)
(Session W) (Abstract) (Timetable) (Report)
|
Mitigation Methods for Reduction
of Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle Bycatch in Fisheries
Conveners: Norman Graham (Norway), Dominic Rihan (Ireland),
and Simon Northridge (UK) (Session
X) (Abstract) (Timetable) (Report)
|
An Interactive Forum with the Fishing
Industry
Convener: Anthony D. Hawkins (UK) (Session
Y) (Abstract) (Timetable) (Report)
|
How to Improve Environmental Monitoring
and Biological Studies – Integrating Ecology and
Statistics
Conveners: Rob Fryer (UK) and Johan Craeymeersch (Netherlands)
(Session Z) (Abstract) (Timetable) (Report)
|
Cod in a Changing Climate
Conveners: Keith Brander (ICES/GLOBEC) and Ken Drinkwater
(Norway) (Session AA) (Abstract) (Timetable) (Report)
|
Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries
Management Worked Examples
Conveners: Paul Connolly (Ireland) and Jake Rice (Canada)
(Session BB) (Abstract) (Timetable) (Report)
|
|
| Multidisciplinary
Approaches to the Identification of Stock Structure
of Small Pelagics: Implications for Assessment and Sustainable
Management (Session K)
|
| Conveners: Emma Hatfield (UK) and Doug Hay (Canada)
The concept of the stock is fundamental
to fisheries management. Identifying stocks, discriminating
among them, and determining the stock composition of
mixed stocks are integral elements of both assessment
and management. Failure to recognise the existence of
stock structure in exploited species can lead to overfishing
and the depletion of less productive units.
The strongest inferences on stock structure
are drawn from a suite of complementary techniques that
cover multiple aspects of the biology of a fish species.
This is partly because the definition of a stock, for
management purposes, is not strictly a genetic construction,
but refers to a semi-discrete group of fish with some
definable attributes of interest to managers. A multidisciplinary
approach to fish stock identification appears to be
particularly pertinent for those species with complex,
and frequently subtle, stock identities.
In the Atlantic, some of the earliest
questions about stock structure and identification began
with stock concept issues formed in the late nineteenth
century, on herring. Some key issues still remain unresolved.
In the Pacific, issues about stock identification have
developed with herring and some other small pelagic
species such as anchovy, sardine, and smelt, in recent
decades. Pelagic species continue to provide a challenge
to both biologists and fisheries managers, due to their
highly variable life history traits, variable population
size and, commonly, strong schooling habit. Many species
straddle several management areas, but may comprise
one, or more, stocks that may not match the imposed
political stock boundaries. Additionally many species
are seasonally migratory. These species, therefore,
are primary candidates for a multidisciplinary approach,
with a suite of methods giving a higher chance of detecting
structure.
This Theme Session aims to provide
a forum for the presentation of results of individual
stock identification methods as components of multidisciplinary
studies, as well as those employing a combination of
different methods. One possible outcome might be the
development of methodological guidelines of particular
utility for discrimination of small pelagic stocks.
Additionally, recommendations on the appropriate incorporation
of stock identification data into the assessment and
management process will be generated, most likely through
relevant case studies. Other studies of implicit relevance,
on non-pelagic species, may be considered.
It will draw together contributions
of relevance from the ICES, PICES, and wider academic
communities and act as a conduit for exchange of information
between these communities.
Contributions are therefore invited on the individual
methods performed within a multidisciplinary structure,
such as:
• Life history comparisons between stocks;
• Morphometrics and meristics;
• Parasites as biological tags;
• Tagging studies;
• Otolith techniques (e.g. microstructure, microchemistry)
;
• Genetic techniques; and the combined analyses
resulting from these methods, such as:
• Mixed stock analyses;
• Temporal stability of traits;
• Threshold decisions for meaningful stock separation;
• and ultimately, the implications for assessment
and sustainable management.
|
| The
Spatial Dimension of Ecosystem Structure and Dynamics
(Session L)
|
| Conveners: Maria Borges (Portugal), Jason Link (USA),
and Einar Svendsen (Norway)
Questions to address:
- Spatial scales of the ecosystem: Downscaling global
atmospheric–oceanic interactions to basin and
local habitat scales;
- Putting spatial pattern into population and ecosystem
models;
- Spatial relationships among biotic communities
and their habitat;
- The spatial aspects of human activities
In order to make progress on addressing
anthropogenic impacts via ecosystem-based approaches,
we need to recognise that ecosystem processes occur
at multiple scales. Thus, it is essential for ecosystem-based
approaches to examine the multiple spatial and temporal
dimensions on which abiotic, biotic, and human processes
occur. Key developments in coupled physical-biological
numerical models still need to be applied more broadly.
Defining habitat across a suite of variables also poses
several challenges, particularly for fisheries issues
at appropriately resolved spatial scales. Recognising
that ecosystem processes operate at multiple temporal
and spatial scales is critical, but incorporating spatial
explicitness into ecosystem and population models remains
a key challenge.
|
| Impact
of External Forcing on Flows in Marine Trophic Networks
(Session M)
|
Conveners: Bärbel Müller-Karulis (Latvia),
Villy Christensen (Canada), and Arturas Razinkovas
(Lithuania)
Marine ecosystems are impacted by anthropogenic as
well as environmental forcing factors, and a scientific
debate has been ongoing for most of a century on the
relative role of such impacts in exploited ecosystems.
Marine ecosystems are under considerable and increasing
pressure worldwide, be it through overfishing, eutrophication,
pollution, climate change, or fluctuating environmental
conditions. At the same time, ecosystem-based management
calls for management actions based on knowledge of
the ecosystem and its dynamics. It is therefore of
concern to be able to evaluate the role of external
forcing on all ecosystem compartments, based on sound
understanding of the processes that control biological
production in ecosystems.
In order to address this objective it is imperative
that time trends from monitoring of marine resources
and their interactions at all trophic levels, e.g.,
from phytoplankton, zooplankton, benthos, fish, marine
mammals, and fisheries, as well as time trends for
environmental and physical forcing factors are evaluated
in an ecosystem context. This will be the focus of
the Theme Session, to which contributions from marine
ecosystems globally are invited, as are methodological
and case studies.
|
| Elasmobranch
Fisheries Science (Session N) |
| Conveners: Maurice Clarke (Ireland), Henk Heessen (Netherlands),
and Jim Ellis (UK)
Elasmobranchs: sharks, rays, and skates,
are a poorly understood group of fishes. They are considered
to be vulnerable to exploitation on account of their
conservative life-history strategies, and there are
documented cases of depletions. However, there are also
cases where abundance appears to be increasing. Scientists
in ICES and neighbouring areas have been working to
improve the scientific basis for the assessment of these
species, both in terms of fisheries management and conservation
related issues. This has been conducted through the
ICES Working Group on Elasmobranch Fishes and through
various international meetings and projects.
In order to further ICES’ goals
in the science of elasmobranch fisheries, it will be
necessary to have a Theme Session in 2005, to provide
a forum for researchers to exchange information and
pool scientific experience of these data-deficient stocks
in the ICES and other areas. By 2005, there will be
the opportunity to draw on the results of new biological
studies carried out by European countries, and to consolidate
on the progress made under the EU-funded DELASS project.
Basic biological studies viz. growth,
mortality, and reproduction are important topics, placing
emphasis on how these data can improve traditional and
novel assessment methods. Assessment methodologies,
for fisheries assessment and vulnerability status, will
be important topics, along with information on stock
structure and migrations.
|
| Connecting
Physical-Biological Interactions to Recruitment Variability,
Ecosystem Dynamics, and the Management of Exploited
Stocks (Session O)
|
| Conveners: Elizabeth North (USA), Mike St. John (Germany),
and Alejandro Gallego (UK)
The interplay between physical and
biological processes, at all scales, is critical for
understanding the dynamics of marine ecosystems. As
such, the development of predictive capacities for these
processes is necessary for assessing and mitigating
the effects of climate change on marine ecosystems.
In particular, these processes affect interannual variability
in recruitment, and the distribution and feeding interactions
of all life stages of exploited fish populations as
well as their prey. Effects are manifested via modification
of vital rates by physical processes at small scales
(e.g. turbulence), mesoscale (e.g. hydrographic fronts,
eddies, jets and river plumes), and large scales (e.g.
currents, transport). Recent progress in field, laboratory,
and modeling research has resulted in advances in empirical
descriptions and numerical parameterizations of physical-biological
interactions influencing lower trophic level production,
and early-stage and adult dynamics of exploited fish
populations. The improved understanding and predictive
ability provided by these advances will enhance our
understanding of the influence of climate forcing on
ecosystems and fish stocks. This understanding is necessary
to improve the state-of-the-art of ecosystem-based fisheries
management. For example, a better understanding of the
physical conditions that promote organism aggregations
or modify nursery habitat will enhance management by
improving the identification of suitable marine protected
areas, design of stock assessment surveys, and determination
of predator-prey interactions.
This Theme Session solicits the results
of modelling, laboratory, and field studies focused
on understanding physical-biological interactions, predicting
their implications for distribution, abundance, and
interactions of species assemblages relative to climate
forcing, and determining their potential for incorporation
in ecosystem-based management strategies.
|
| Regional
Ecosystem Pilot Projects, Ecosystem Forecasting, and
Operational Oceanography: Comparing and Contrasting
Scientific Tools, Strategies, Outputs, and Applications
(Session P)
|
| Conveners: Wulf Greve (Germany) (ICES), Glen W. Harrison
(Canada) (IOC), and Skip McKinnell (Canada) (PICES)
Operational oceanography and the development
of ecosystem forecasting (and hindcasting) tools depend
as much on the physical-biological models and conceptual
tools as they depend on consistent, high quality sample
and data collection. Sampling and survey plans and designs
are in turn dependant on good theory and models. One
way of implementing operational oceanography and ecosystem
forecasting in a practical way is through regional ecosystem
pilot projects. The GOOS-endorsed definition of a “pilot
project”: “an organised, planned set of
activities with focused objectives designed to provide
an evaluation of technology, methods, or concepts within
a defined schedule and having the overall goal of advancing
the development of the sustained, integrated ocean observing
system.” Increasingly operational oceanography
and regional ecosystem pilot projects are being established
throughout the ICES/IOC/PICES area, aimed at delivering
information in order to support an ecosystem approach
to fisheries and environmental management. There are
lessons to be learnt by comparing and contrasting the
differing approaches taken in different regions. The
session aims at drawing together experiences obtained
from different regional ecosystem pilot projects and
generating useful recommendations for future developments.
The aim is to enhance and review this dialog between
marine scientists contributing in these areas, and to
promote practical suggestions and outcomes relevant
to requirements of marine resource managers. Also the
Theme Session could provide a forum for individuals
involved in the policy and practise of marine resource
management to give input into the processes they depend
on so much for advice and assessment tools.
|
| Advances
in Reproductive Biology: Methodology and Applications
for Fisheries Science (Session Q)
|
| Conveners: Olav Sigurd Kjesbu (Norway), Gudrun Marsteinsdottir
(Iceland), Joanna Tomkiewicz (Denmark), and Peter R. Witthames
(UK)
Within management advice for a fishery
is a need to be able to estimate the number of new individuals
that will enter the population or the fishery. In many
instances this is still based on the classic stock and
recruit relationships or on a slightly more complex
model that incorporates some aspect of the status of
the spawning stock or prevalent environmental conditions.
It is essential that if progress is to be made toward
being able to predict ‘recruitment’ then
there must be a better understanding of the processes
that underpin the quantity and quality of egg production
in a stock. There is also a need to understand how different
environmental conditions will impact egg production.
In addition, the backward projection of spawning stock
biomass from methods such as the Annual Egg Production
Method relies on reliable estimates of the realised
(viable) egg production from a given stock.
The overall aim is to develop our understanding
of the importance of reproductive biology to fisheries
science, explicitly being able to incorporate the individual
level responses into stock level responses. This Theme
Session seeks papers on the reproductive biology of
fish, shellfish, or squids, focused on a methodology
for better stock assessment and applications to investigate
the relationship between stock size and ‘viable
egg’ production.
Topics to be addressed include:
- Experimental biology on reproduction, aimed at
discovering the factors which are important for determining
the viable egg production in the field;
- Evidence for and against an invariant reproductive
potential in response to changes in the environment
that arise, for example, from short- to long-term
fluctuations or as a consequence of climatic change
or anthropogenic effects;
- Advances in methodology aimed at providing a more
accurate assessment of realised fecundity, both male
and female reproductive potential, in relation to
stock biomass. The advances can be presented as the
current state of development or as part of other programs
designed to estimate spawning stock biomass independent
of fishery data, e.g. egg production models or survey
techniques;
- Modelling approaches to incorporate biologically
relevant data into forecasting population dynamics
and biological reference points in response to a fishery
or environmental change.
|
| Marine
Mammals: Monitoring Techniques, Abundance Estimation,
and Interactions with Fisheries (Session R)
|
| Conveners: Mike Hammill (Canada), Tero Härkönen
(Sweden), and Philip Hammond (UK)
The role of seals and cetaceans as
top predators in marine ecosystems has been the focus
of increasing discussion in recent years. Marine mammals
interact with fisheries in a number of ways. Direct
interactions include commercial and aboriginal subsistence
hunting and bycatch of marine mammals in a variety of
fishing gears, and damage by seals to fishing gear and
fish catch. Indirect interactions involve the impact
of large and/or increasing populations of marine mammals
on fish stocks and fisheries yield and, conversely,
the impact of reduced fish stocks due to overfishing
on marine mammal populations.
To quantify interactions between marine
mammals and fisheries (and the impact of direct removals)
we need, at a minimum, data on abundance, spatial distribution,
and diet of marine mammal populations. In most cases,
even this information is lacking so that it is possible
to make only very crude assessments. To develop dynamic
models of interactions, we need life history data including
population growth rates, and data on how the consumption
of fish by marine mammals varies with the size of fish
stocks – their functional response.
Several approaches have been applied to estimate the
abundance of whales and seals (e.g., total counts, mark-recapture
experiments, line transect sampling), their distribution
(e.g. visual sightings, tag returns, satellite telemetry),
and their diet (e.g. stomach contents analysis, faecal
analysis, fatty acid analysis), and there has been considerable
development in both data collection and analytical methodology
in recent years. In addition, there is new work on dynamic
modelling of marine mammal–fish interactions.
The present Theme Session will allow researchers with
experience of abundance, distribution, and diet estimation
of different marine mammal species and of modelling
these data to meet and discuss the advantages and disadvantages
of the different approaches used. Issues raised will
include data requirements and availability, the validity
and realism of the various assumptions required for
each method, sensitivity of the results to these assumptions,
and how uncertainty is dealt with and quantified.
|
| Oil
Spills in Marine Ecosystems: Impacts and Remediation
(Session S) |
| Conveners: Joan Albaigés (Spain) and Kenneth
Lee (Canada)
Coastal and offshore waters of the
ICES area have been impacted by numerous large spills
from tankers, such as the recent Prestige spill. More
importantly, perhaps, large volumes of oil are spilled
into the sea continuously through chronic spillage from
numerous sources. This Theme Session will highlight
the results of investigations from the Prestige spill
but will also encourage papers describing the impacts
from other major spills, as well as papers describing
the impacts of chronic spills. In addition to the impact
from the spilled oil, efforts to clean up the oil in
the environment can have significant impacts. Papers
will be solicited on the impacts of clean-up operations
and the description of low-impact remediation techniques.
Besides large spills, the Theme Session
will include the effects of smaller persistent spills,
long-term impacts of drilling muds, produced water,
the impact on the biology of marine species, and the
inclusion of the coastal zone.
|
| Integrating/Implicating
Genetics into Fisheries Management
(Session T)
|
| Conveners: Ellen Kenchington (Canada) and Filip Volckaert
(Belgium)
Effective fisheries management relies
on the integration of diverse approaches such as biological
sciences, oceanography, climatology, and information
technology. Foremost among developments have been technological
and conceptual advances in genetics, affording new insights
into stock discrimination, population structure, ecosystem
functioning, selective fishing, exotic species, food
tracing, conservation, and impacts of climate change.
In addition, progress in genomics is poised to advance
our understanding of natural marine resources further.
The focus of this Session will be to consider how recent
developments in genetics may contribute to key challenges
in fisheries management, with emphasis on practical
implementation.
|
| Acoustic
Techniques for Three-dimensional Characterization and
Classification of the Pelagic Ecosystem (Session U)
|
| Conveners: Arnaud Bertrand (France) and Rolf Korneliussen
(Norway)
Comprehension of the three-dimensional
and dynamic features of pelagic marine ecosystems is
important for developing effective methodology to support
ecosystem-based management of marine resources. To achieve
this goal, there is an increasing need for efficient
tools to conserve the ecosystem integrity when studying
fish populations. Acoustics techniques are non-intrusive,
and may be used to look at aquatic ecosystems over a
broad range of spatial and temporal scales. Powerful
3-D visualisation systems can be applied on 2-D and
3-D acoustic devices to observe marine ecosystems with
a new perspective.
The three-dimensional scales of aquatic
ecosystems range from the smallest (centimetres) to
the widest areas (hundreds of nautical miles). Physical,
chemical, and biological properties show strong gradients
(e.g. coast/offshore, north/south, high/low temperature)
and complex structures (e.g. fronts, eddies) along the
vertical and the horizontal planes, forming specific
habitats for pelagic organisms. The improved understanding
of the relation between the environmental characteristics
and the organisms, as well as their intra- and inter-specific
interactions, preserving the three-dimensional context
where these interactions take place is important. New
technologies and approaches to efficiently collect,
compute, display, and validate three-dimensional multivariate
data on aquatic ecosystems are now available. This Session
aims at presenting the current state of methodology
for characterization and visualisation of spatial and
temporal dynamics in marine pelagic ecosystems while
preserving the 3-D spatial context. Case studies presenting
applications and future potentials of these methodologies
would also be strongly appreciated in this Session.
|
| Fishers’
Perceptions and Responses in Management Implementation
(Session V)
|
Conveners: Sakari Kuikka (Finland), Poul Degnbol (Denmark),
and Svein Jentoft (Norway) Effective
fisheries management is dependent on compliance and
industry adaptations not counteracting the objectives
of management. A wide discussion is required to agree
on the scientific principles and required knowledge
as basis for evaluations of management performance
and fisheries agreements. The aim of the session is
to discuss the role of fishers' perception of the management
issues and their adaptation to management implementation
in the evaluation of fisheries management decisions.
Fishers' perception of the management issues and management
implementation has important consequences as to the
legitimacy of management and thus also for compliance.
Furthermore, fishers will adapt to management regulations
by choosing harvest tactics that pursue their own objectives
as individual operators. These responses to management
implementation can from a technical point of view be
seen as a source of uncertainty in reference points
and prediction which has the same effect as any other
scientific uncertainty. It is likely that a better understanding
of this uncertainty in many cases would enable a better
basis for determining justified management actions.
Furthermore, the uncertainty may be reduced by increased
participation of fishers in the management decision
processes, which will increase legitimacy and contribute
to regulations being better adapted to the practical
realities of fishers. Various initiatives and re-defined
user rights have been taken for increased participation
of fishers in management decisions. In the technical
domain there are no agreed rules for the estimation
of the uncertainty associated with adaptations or lack
of compliance. The understanding of compliance and adaptations
is clearly a multidisciplinary task. Strong cooperation
is needed between sociologists, economists, legal experts,
stock assessment scientists, and managers to understand
compliance and adaptations and how the institutional
setup of management can be modified in such a way that
outcomes will better fulfil objectives with high compliance
when the adaptation takes place.
Various aspects of management (participation
of users in both policy and management decisions and
regulatory tools which are more appropriate to the realities
of fisheries) may be developed and implemented to reduce
management uncertainty and make fisheries management
more effective in achieving objectives. The Theme Session
is of a strongly multi-disciplinary nature and requires
active participation from many fields of applied sciences.
Presentations from various stakeholders (fishers, managers,
and other stakeholders) are also expected.
Contributions are invited on:
• Role of implementation uncertainty in the definition
of reference points;
• Case studies on fishers' adaptations to management
actions;
• Case studies and methodology to study user participation,
legitimacy and compliance;
• Methodological solutions to estimate and model
implementation uncertainty;
• Management instruments which are participatory
and appropriate to the realities of fisheries practices;
• Stakeholders’ experiences about successful
and unsuccessful management operations related to implementation;
• Fishers' decisions regarding risk-taking and
investments in relation to various harvest control rules.
|
| Rebuilding
Programmes for Threatened Fish Populations (Session
W)
|
| Conveners: Ted Potter (UK) and Russell Poole (Ireland)
There have been substantial declines
in the abundance of many fish stocks in recent years,
and many diadromous species in particular have been
classified as vulnerable, threatened, or endangered
throughout all or part of their ranges. However, while
the status of the main commercial species receives considerable
publicity, much less attention is paid to other species
that are still important from a conservation perspective.
The management of many rare and endangered species may
also be constrained by the lack of data, and there is
therefore an urgent need to combine information between
research agencies. The objective of this Theme Session
is therefore to share best practice on the development
and management of programmes to rebuild threatened or
depleted fish populations.
The short-term management response
to declining stock abundance is generally to reduce
or eliminate exploitation. In many cases this will address
only part of the problem, and there will be a need to
develop a more comprehensive programme of management
and research activities to address the causes of the
stock decline in the longer term. This is particularly
true for diadromous species, which are more often affected
by a range of human activities at various stages in
their lives. Such stock rebuilding programmes may involve
a number of processes, including perhaps: the development
of assessment procedures and harvest rules; evaluation
of natural and anthropogenic factors affecting the stock;
instigation of insurance measures (e.g. gene banks);
engagement with stakeholder groups; assessment of social
and economic factors; development of plans to prioritise
management actions and research; and monitoring and
evaluation of progress against forecast recovery trajectories.
Papers are invited on any of these topics, but are
particularly sought on:
• Guidance for the development of integrated rebuilding
programmes;
• Evaluation of alternative stock rebuilding strategies;
• Identification and involvement of stakeholder
groups in recovery programmes;
• Results of both successful and unsuccessful
rebuilding programmes and the lessons to be learnt;
• Plans and proposals for new rebuilding and recovery
plans.
|
| Mitigation
Methods for Reduction of Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle
Bycatch in Fisheries (Session X)
|
| Conveners: Norman Graham (Norway), Dominic Rihan (Ireland),
and Simon Northridge (UK)
The incidental bycatch of cetaceans,
pinnepeds, and sea turtles associated with commercial
fishing operations is an issue of global concern. Fisheries
managers are under increasing pressure from governments,
NGOs, and the general public to protect these large
marine mammals and turtles from fishing activities.
There are a number of high-profile fisheries where,
from an ethical and/or biological perspective, such
bycatches are unacceptable. Some examples include the
capture of dolphins during pelagic trawling, the entanglement
of whales in marker ropes, and the bycatch of turtles
in both longline and tropical shrimp trawl fisheries.
In some instances, managers have closed viable fisheries
due to marine mammal issues, and some fisheries have
suffered economic downturn due to consumer boycots,
for example the Eastern Pacific tuna purse seine fishery
that resulted in the concept of ‘dolphin-friendly’
tuna. However, modifications to fishing gear and/or
fishing practices can, in many instances, provide practical
and workable alternatives for fisheries managers, allowing
the continuation of fishing activities while preventing
the unnecessary capture of cetaceans, etc. Worldwide,
there are a number of successful examples where technical
conservation measures have greatly reduced fisheries
impacts. The use of turtle excluder devices (TEDs) in
many tropical shrimp fisheries has reduced the mortality
rates of several turtle species, while modification
of hook shape has reduced bycatches associated with
longline fisheries. Considerable research has focussed
on technical modifications to fishing gears to minimise
such bycatch, the development of acoustic deterrents,
and on operational changes. This Theme Session is intended
to provide scientists the opportunity to present their
research into mitigation measures to reduce bycatch;
to provide examples where such measures have been applied
and to produce a summary review.
Contributions to the Session should address any of
the following themes:
• Current management practices for reducing bycatch
of pinnipeds, marine mammals, and sea turtles;
• Behavioural studies and observations on the
interaction of bycatch species with fishing gear;
• Gear modifications, acoustic deterrent devices,
and alternative fishing tactics to reduce bycatch;
• Predicted impacts of gear modifications and
operational changes on populations of cetaceans, pinnepeds,
and sea turtles;
• The effectiveness of mitigation measures in
terms of acceptability to the fishing industry, considering
economic impact and additional costs and including enforcement;
• Identification of potential solutions in other
fisheries to reducing bycatch by employing similar technologies
or methods.
|
| An
Interactive Forum with the Fishing Industry (Session
Y) |
| Convener: Anthony D. Hawkins (UK)
Until recently fisheries science, and
especially stock assessment, was carried out entirely
by scientists, without fishers themselves taking part.
Fishers were seen as providers of data, but not as active
participants. There was a perception that stock assessment
should be independent from fishers’ concerns and
isolated from fishers’ lobbying. Fisheries science
was the responsibility only of specialised experts.
Indeed, fishers were excluded from
the whole system of fisheries management. Again, management
was seen as the province of experts. Fishers were placed
firmly on the sidelines as scientists and managers played
the game of fisheries management. It was considered
that only the results should concern the fishing industry.
Those circumstances are now changing.
The results gained through this system of fisheries
management have not been impressive, even to the players
themselves. Fisheries science has been increasingly
difficult to carry out as fish stocks have declined.
Both the fisheries themselves and the management regimes
are changing rapidly. Fishers are refusing to support
the game and are withholding information on their catches.
The assessments themselves are becoming uncertain and
retrospective. It has become evident that there is a
need for a different approach, incorporating new paradigms
and based on the wider use of data from fishers themselves;
data which are both accurate and up-to-date. At the
same time, the rigid game-plan of fisheries management
has itself changed. Fishery managers are increasingly
seeking advice directly from fishers and other stakeholders.
It is time for fishery managers and
the scientists who support them to engage more closely
with fishers and other stakeholders – to involve
them in the game. The help of fishers is needed both
to improve the stock assessments and to arrive at successful
management measures.
There have been many successful recent
examples of fishers working closely with scientists.
The Theme Session will start by considering examples
of these and seeking out examples of good practice.
The Session will then move on to look at future collaboration
between fishers and scientists in the context of the
new, more participatory forms of fisheries management
currently being introduced.
|
| How
to Improve Environmental Monitoring and Biological Studies
– Integrating Ecology and Statistics (Session
Z)
|
| Conveners: Rob Fryer (UK) and Johan Craeymeersch (Netherlands)
This Theme Session will solicit papers
dealing with environmental monitoring, environmental
impact, and other biological studies using statistics
such as:
• the probability of detecting environmental
impacts and biological effects;
• methods for spatial and temporal trend studies;
• the probability of detecting point sources or
episodic events;
• cost-effective sampling design using statistics.
The Session will document the essential
use of a statistical approach to the design and assessment
of environmental monitoring. Papers will be solicited
that demonstrate the effective use of power analyses
for sampling design to insure cost effectiveness while
achieving the desired level of probability of detecting
an impact. This session will provide practical examples
of how statistics can be implemented in planning and
assessing the results of monitoring programs.
Chairs should actively look for relevant papers, including
case studies.
|
| Cod
in a Changing Climate (Session AA) |
| Conveners: Keith Brander (ICES/GLOBEC) and Ken Drinkwater
(Norway)
This Theme Session will coincide with the 2005 publication
of the book on Cod in a Changing Climate and will contribute
to the Cod and Climate Change strategic plan.
The book and the Theme Session are
intended to make information on status and trends in
cod stocks available to a wider public and to make them
aware of the contribution of ICES to international marine
science. The biological and life history processes underlying
climate-driven changes in fish stocks include recruitment
(i.e. the number of young fish produced), growth, maturation,
natural mortality, and migration. Thanks to the commercial
importance of North Atlantic cod, a long history of
research, and a dedicated programme within ICES on Cod
and Climate Change over the past decade, much has been
learned about these processes and about their interaction
with each other and with the food chain, predators,
and other components of the marine ecosystem. Cod is
probably the most comprehensively studied marine fish
species, occupying a key role in several North Atlantic
ecosystems. An understanding of its dynamics is of direct
and indirect relevance to other species and to gaining
insight into the response of the marine ecosystem to
climate change and variability. The Cod and Climate
Change programme is a regional component of the Global
Ocean Ecosystem Dynamics (GLOBEC) programme of IGBP.
Speakers will be invited to present the subjects on
which they have contributed in the book. They will review
many aspects of our knowledge of cod, but will also
report new results and analyses. They will use a comparative
approach to draw conclusions from differences and similarities
between the many stocks, which occupy a range of different
physical and biological situations.
|
| Ecosystem
Approach to Fisheries Management Worked Examples (Session
BB)
|
| Conveners: Paul Connolly (Ireland) and Jake Rice (Canada)
Through instruments such as the Bergen
Declaration and Reykjavik Declaration, ICES, its member
states, and major client commissions have all embraced
movement to an Ecosystem Approach to management of human
activities in the seas. The Ecosystem Approach to fisheries
management is more than an abstract concept for the
future; it is emerging as practical reality today. The
full impact of this broadening of the basis for managing
fisheries has yet to be felt in much of the ICES area,
and much remains to be consolidated to provide the scientific
basis for taking an Ecosystem Approach to fisheries.
Nonetheless there are concrete examples of moving towards
an Ecosystem Approach in a number of fisheries in the
North Atlantic and globally. ICES needs to learn from
these global practical examples, and apply the lessons
quickly in its own science and advice. This Theme Session
will be built around several selected examples of practical
implementations of an ecosystem approach to contemporary
fisheries management and supporting scientific advice.
Authors will be recruited by the conveners for case
histories and will be provided with sufficient speaking
time to illustrate exactly both what was done, with
the existing knowledge, to move fisheries management
to a more inclusive ecosystem approach, and how the
management and prosecution of the fisheries was changed.
Contributed papers will also be considered for the Theme
Session, but selection will apply stringent standards
of truly operational examples rather than just discussions
of concepts and possibilities.
|
|
|